Legal Opinion

Ward v. Beaunit Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1982No. 8110IC535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Under the provisions of G.S. 97-86, the Industrial Commission is the fact finding body, and findings of fact made by the Commission are binding on appeal if supported by competent evidence. Walston v. Burlington Industries, 304 N.C. 670, 285 S.E. 2d 822 (1982); Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 283 S.E. 2d 101 (1981); Morrison v. Burlington Industries, 304 N.C. 1, 282 S.E. 2d 458 (1981). In making its findings of fact, however, it is the duty of the Commission to consider, weigh, and evaluate all of the competent evidence before it. Harrell v. Stevens & Co., 45 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gupton v. Builders TransportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Cotton v. Fulflex of North CarolinaNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API