Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Hipskind

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1909No. 21,384PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Prom Jay Circuit Court; John F. LaFolette, Judge. Suit by Philip Hipskind and others against James A. Dawson and others. Prom a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

This was a suit by appellees against appellants to foreclose a lien arising out of an assessment made against appellants ’ property for the improvement of a certain public street in the city of Portland, Jay county, Indiana, a city of the fifth class. Appellants are property owners, against whom benefits were assessed on account of the improvement of said street, and appellees are contractors, to whom the contract for performing the work of improving the street was let by the common council of said city. The improvement of the street was made under and in pursuance of the provisions of an act…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hibben v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Stroup v. StroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Anderson v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Alsmeier v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hoffman v. ZollmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. State ex rel. German Investment & Securities Co. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API