Kilps v. Pawinski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The principal issue presented on this appeal is whether condemnation of a portion of the rented property constructively evicted the respondent as lessee.
This is a question of first impression in this state. It is well settled in other jurisdictions that the taking of the entire premises by condemnation operates to terminate the lease and release the tenant from liability to pay rent. In addition, although there is authority to the contrary, 2 the general rule is that a partial taking of a leasehold estate under the power of eminent domain does not amount to an eviction and the lessee remains…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Corrigan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Leonard v. Autocar Sales & Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Gluck v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- City of Pasadena v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Batcheller v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Wisconsin Mall Properties, LLC v. Younkers, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006