Legal Opinion
Feezor v. Tesstab Operations Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 17, 2007No. Civil 07cv840-L(BLM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION [doc. # 6]; and DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STATE LAW CLAIMS
M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed the above-captioned case on May 9, 2007 alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) as well as California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”) and Disabled Persons Act (“DPA”) against defendants Tesstab Operations Group, Inc, dba Mcdonald’s # 5416 (“Tesstab”); and Mcdonald’s Corporation. Defendant Tesstab 1 moves the Court to decline to exercise supplemental…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Kathleen Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, Escondido Alan Corbin Randy Vogel, and Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Doug Wander v. Jack S. Kaus Irene B. KausCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Capolupo v. EillsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Langer v. Honey Baked Ham, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Schutza v. Enniss Family Realty I LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Schutza v. Union City Investments LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Strojnik v. Kamla Hotels, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.