Legal Opinion
Capolupo v. Eills
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 5, 2019No. 1:18-cv-07458Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 CARRIE ANN CAPOLUPO, Case No. 18-cv-07458-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 KRISTEN EILLS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 12 Defendants. 13 14 Now pending before the court is Defendants’ Motion (dkt. 51) seeking dismissal of 15 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (dkt. 49) without further leave to amend. 16 Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 54), and Defendants have replied (dkt. 55). For the reasons stated 17 below, Defendants’ Motion is granted in…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.