Legal Opinion

Rosenlof v. Sullivan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1983No. 18408PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

This is an appeal and cross appeal from a jury verdict in a case involving a real estate transaction. We affirm the jury verdict and remand to the district court for a determination of reasonable attorney’s fees on this appeal.

Ned Sullivan, the defendant and the seller of the real estate in dispute, purchased property in St. George, Utah, and obtained a building permit for the construction of a single family dwelling. He commenced construction of a duplex even though he knew that the size of the property was too small for a duplex under the zoning laws. During the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Coulter v. City of RawlinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bishop v. GenTec Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hillier v. LambornCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  3. State v. TolmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Gill v. TimmUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Deats v. Commercial Security BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API