Legal Opinion

People v. Mock Yick Gar

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1910No. Crim. No. 273PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Wm. P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Defendant was charged with placing his wife in a house of prostitution. He was convicted, and has appealed to this court from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence shows without conflict that defendant was married to the prosecutrix, a Japanese woman, at Redwood City on the eighteenth day of April, 1907. The ceremony was performed by a justice of the peace. On or about May 1, 1909, defendant placed the said woman, who had been a prostitute before the marriage, in a house of prostitution in the city and county of San Francisco, .and there lived with her for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. WintersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. LaMarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. State v. ConverseUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bellus v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. MenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API