State v. Converse
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Second District; lion. J. A. Howell, Judge. C. H- Converse was convicted of grand larceny and be appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStkaup, J.
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny. He was charged with stealing forty-one plumes from the store of Lyman Bros. Company, a corporation, at Ogden, on the 19th day of June, 1909. The manager and employees of the store testified that the forty-one plumes, a sample line, were in the store on the evening of the 19th of June, at about five o’clock, when the store was closed. The next day, which was Sunday, when they entered the store between one and three o’clock in the afternoon, and looked the stock of plumes over, they found about forty-one of them missing. As testified to by *73them, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- People v. Mock Yick GarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. KinseyUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. MellorUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. LarisUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.