Legal Opinion

In re Burnett ex rel. Finburg

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1945Published

1Per curiam

On 16 July, 1945, tbe date of tbe bearing below, petitioner’s parole was revoked in due form. G. S., 134-85. He is now lawfully detained. Tbe legality of bis original arrest and detention is presently academic. Hence tbe motion of tbe Attorney-General to dismiss must be allowed. Cochran v. Rowe, ante, 645; Martin v. Sloan, 69 N. C., 128; S. v. R. R., 74 N. C., 287; Waters v. Boyd, 179 N. C., 180, 102 S. E., 196; Trade Association v. Doughton, 192 N. C., 384, 135 S. E., 131; Board of Education v. Comrs. of Johnston, 198 N. C., 430, 152 S. E., 156; Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 217 N. C., 691, 9…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State on Rel. Martin v. . Sloan .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Waters v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Efird v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Board of Education v. . Commissioners of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API