Young v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The trial court sitting without a jury adjudged appellant guilty of possession of a controlled substance in violation of D.C.Code § 38-541(d) and sentenced him to 180 days imprisonment pursuant to the so-called Misdemeanor Streamlining Act of 1994.1
The only issue appellant raises on this appeal is that he was entitled to a jury trial because the offense of which he was charged and convicted is not “petty” within the meaning of the Supreme Court’s decisions such as Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968), and Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538, 109…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Foote v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fretes-Zarate v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.