Legal Opinion

Fretes-Zarate v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2012No. 11-CM-74PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Liz V. Fretes-Zarate, appeals her conviction for simple assault in violation of D.C.Code § 22-404 (2009 Supp.). She argues that she had a constitutional right to a trial by jury for this offense because a conviction subjects her to deportation under federal immigration law. She also argues that she was denied a fair trial by the prejudicial errors of a translator, and that the trial judge erred in not allowing her to impeach the complaining witness with evidence of a prior civil protection order she had obtained against him. Lastly, she contends the evidence was legally…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnnie Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. JEAN-BAPTISTE BADO v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API