Legal Opinion

Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2018No. 12-CM-1509Published

1ConcurrenceWashington, Senior Judge

As my colleagues have made clear in their competing opinions in this case, our attempt to reconcile the Supreme Court's decisions in Baldwin v. New York , 399 U.S. 66 , 90 S.Ct. 1886 , 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970), and Blanton v. City of N. Las Vegas , 489 U.S. 538 , 109 S.Ct. 1289 , 103 L.Ed.2d 550 (1989), with the D.C. Misdemeanor Streamlining Act, see Omnibus Criminal Justice Reform Act of 1994, D.C. Law § 10-151, 41 D.C. Reg. 2608 (effective Aug. 20, 1994), has resulted in a decision where two individuals charged with the same misdemeanor crime in the District of Columbia enjoy very different…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · Glickman; Dissent · Fisher.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API