Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceWashington, Senior Judge
As my colleagues have made clear in their competing opinions in this case, our attempt to reconcile the Supreme Court's decisions in Baldwin v. New York , 399 U.S. 66 , 90 S.Ct. 1886 , 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970), and Blanton v. City of N. Las Vegas , 489 U.S. 538 , 109 S.Ct. 1289 , 103 L.Ed.2d 550 (1989), with the D.C. Misdemeanor Streamlining Act, see Omnibus Criminal Justice Reform Act of 1994, D.C. Law § 10-151, 41 D.C. Reg. 2608 (effective Aug. 20, 1994), has resulted in a decision where two individuals charged with the same misdemeanor crime in the District of Columbia enjoy very different…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · Glickman; Dissent · Fisher.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.