Moore v. Strickling
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Tyler County. Application of S. Moore and others for the removal from office of James II. Strickling-, prosecuting- attorney. From the judgment of removal, defendant bring-s error.
1Opinion of the Court
Dent, President:
On the 22d day of July, 1898, J. H. Strickling, prosecuting attorney of the County of Tyler, was found guilty of gross immorality by the circuit court of such county, under the following specification and charge, denominated specification No. 25, to wit: “It is further charged and averred that during all the year 1897, and during which time James H. Strickling was prosecuting attorney of the county of Tyler, he was grossly immoral and guilty of grossly immoral conduct in this: That he did on divers occasions visit a certain house of ill fame in the town of Sistersville, county…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
- Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Donahue v. County of WillIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Page v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Mial v. Ellington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Tarrant County v. AshmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Daugherty v. EllisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
- Simpson v. StantonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.