Legal Opinion

National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. McDavitt

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2002No. 98-CV-1881, 99-CV-195PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Ray E. McDavitt filed a complaint under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) for negligence after he was injured in a train derailment in the Washington Terminal coach yard near Union Station in the District of Columbia. Amtrak denied fault and blamed McDavitt for the accident. The case was tried to a jury, which found Amtrak negligent and McDav-itt contributorily negligent. Apportioning liability under FELA’s comparative negligence framework, the jury found two-thirds of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Mary J. Riordan v. William L. Kempiners and Shirley RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Toy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Doe v. Medlantic Health Care Group, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Tolu v. AyodejiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Rhodes v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Calva-Cerqueira v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API