Legal Opinion
Doe v. Medlantic Health Care Group, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 2003No. 00-CV-247, 00-CV-275PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*942RUIZ, Associate Judge:
A jury awarded a verdict to John Doe against Medlantic Health Care Group, Inc (“Medlantic”) in the amount of $250,000 for breach of confidential relationship.1 The trial court subsequently granted Median-tic’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the grounds that Doe’s action was filed outside the one-year statute of limitations. On appeal, Doe claims the trial court erred in granting judgment to Medlantic because it substituted its own view for that of the jury on the question of when the cause of action accrued, and erroneously applied a one-year statute…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Etheredge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Homan v. GoyalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Houshang Momenian v. Michael DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Randolph v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Brin v. S.E.W. InvestorsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Liser v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.