State v. McArthur
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
Concern about the trustworthiness of confessions of criminal misconduct has led to the enunciation of the corpus delicti rule, pursuant to which a criminal conviction cannot be based only on an uncorroborated extrajudicial confession of guilt. State v. Far-num, 275 Conn. 26, 33, 878 A.2d 1095 (2005). In this case, the defendant confessed to conduct implicating himself in the abduction and death of a victim to whose skeletal remains he led the police. The principal issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the corroborative evidence to sustain the defendant’s conviction of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Glover v. EIGHTH JUD. DIST. COURT OF STATENevada Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MungrooConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. FauntleroyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. CollinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. AmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.