Legal Opinion

State v. Fauntleroy

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 8, 2007No. AC 27016PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The defendant, Darryl Fauntleroy, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempt to commit burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-103 (a), attempt to commit larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-125b, and criminal mischief in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-117. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the state produced insufficient evidence for the jury to find him guilty of all charges and that the trial court was thus obligated to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. State v. EadySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. State v. PelosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. State v. DamatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. State v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. NievesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API