Legal Opinion

State v. Ames

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 14, 2017No. AC38397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.

The defendant, Mary J. Ames, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial before a three judge court, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that she failed to prove her affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance by a fair preponderance of the evidence, (2) concluded that the state had disproven her self-defense claim beyond a reasonable doubt, (3) concluded that the state had established that she possessed the specific intent to cause the victim's death beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Richardson v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HaynesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  2. State v. SoyiniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. State v. Robert R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  4. State v. AmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. State v. Haynes (Concurrence & Dissent)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API