Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Mihelic

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 8, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01807Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS OLIVER, Case No.: 21cv1807-LL-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO 13 v. DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE [ECF Nos. 5, 9] 14 KRISTIN TAVIA MIHELIC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Presently before the Court are two Motions to Dismiss. ECF Nos. 5, 9. The first 19 motion is Defendant “United States’ Motion to Dismiss Claims One and Three Through 20 Seven of the Removed Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and 21 Failure to Allege a Cognizable Claim” (hereinafter “United States’ Motion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API