Legal Opinion
In re Polaris Mktg.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 6, 2019No. Case No. 18-cv-0939 (WMW/DTS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge
In this consolidated putative class action litigation, Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs' amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) for failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. 42.) For the reasons addressed below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are eleven individuals who reside in eleven states throughout the United States.1 Defendant Polaris Industries, Inc., is a Delaware corporation based in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Blankenship v. USA Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michael Tucker v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Bollom v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Corval Constructors, Inc. v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Dahlberg v. Winnebago Industries, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2024
- ImageTrend, Inc. v. Locality Media, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.