State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Braswell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice.
¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are, (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? 1 and (2) Is disbarment with imposition of costs an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent’s breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
¶2 The Oklahoma Bar Association (the “Bar”) charged Michael T. Braswell (“Bras-well” or “respondent”), a licensed lawyer, with four counts of professional misconduct. After…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BEDNARSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- In Re SpilmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.