Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Braswell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1998No. SCBD 4117PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are, (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? 1 and (2) Is disbarment with imposition of costs an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent’s breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

¶2 The Oklahoma Bar Association (the “Bar”) charged Michael T. Braswell (“Bras-well” or “respondent”), a licensed lawyer, with four counts of professional misconduct. After…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BEDNARSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. In Re SpilmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API