Legal Opinion

Jones v. Peabody

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1935No. 25408. Department OnePublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

This action was brought for the purpose of recovering an attorney’s fee. The defendants demanded a jury trial, which was denied. The trial to the court resulted in a judgment sustaining a recovery, from which the defendants appeal.

The respondents H. B. Jones and R. E. Bronson are surviving members of the law firm of Bronson, Jones & Bronson. The other respondents are R. E. Bronson, as executor, and Hallie Bronson, as executrix, of the last will and testament of Ira Bronson, deceased. The appellants Harriet L. Peabody and Alexander M. Peabody are parties to the action in their…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gow v. MauryMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hewitt v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Corcoran v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Estate of Wind v. WindWashington Supreme Court · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API