Rodgers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.
In this workers’ compensation matter, petitioner Arthur Rodgers, the employee, contends that the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) used the wrong formula in determining the credit against future workers’ compensation payments to which his employer is entitled under Labor Code section 38611 as interpreted in Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 829 [150 Cal.Rptr. 888, 587 P.2d 684], As we explain, the WCAB’s approach is totally faithful to the rationale of Associated Construction and, in addition, is consistent with a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Neighbarger v. Irwin Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Blecker v. WolbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Graham v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & County Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bracket v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Barringer v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.