Legal Opinion

Board of Directors Turlock Irr. Dist. v. City of Ceres

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1953No. Civ. 8179PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

The board of directors of the Turlock Irrigation District as trustees and officers of Improvement District No. 14-A, commenced an action for declaratory relief for the purpose of having it judicially determined whether the plaintiff or the defendants are responsible for the protection, maintenance and upkeep of that portion of plaintiff’s irrigation pipeline which lies in and is crossed by certain public streets in the city of Ceres.

Some time prior to the year 1904 a ditch known as “Lateral A” was constructed as a farmers’ or community ditch leading from a canal belonging to the Turlock…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Fleming v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Matthiessen v. GrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Case v. UridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. McCann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Bauer v. MeriganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Board of Directors of Turlock Irrigation District v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API