Legal Opinion
Jamul Action Committee v. Jonodev Chaudhuri
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2016No. 15-16021PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion issued in this appeal is amended as follows:
On page 6 of the slip opinion, replace Rosales v. United States, 275 F. App’x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2008), with Rosales v. United States, 73 F. App’x 913 (9th Cir. 2003). With that amendment, Plaintiffs-Appellants’. petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The petition for rehearing en banc remains pending..
CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:
OPINION
This case is about an Indian gaming casino in Jamul, California, a rural community close to San Diego, California. The Jamul Indian Village, a federally recognized Indian tribe and a non-party to this suit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Assn. of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jamul Action Committee v. E. Sequoyah SimermeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Stand Up for California! v. UsdoiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Jamul Action Committee v. ChaudhuriDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Stand Up for Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.