Legal Opinion

Loshbaugh v. Birdsell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,089PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

— This proceeding was instituted by the appellant and others for the location of a highway across the appellee’sland. ' An order was made locating the road and awarding-damages to the appellee. An appeal was taken to the circuit-court, and upon the trial the jury, to whom the issues were submitted, returned a verdict that the highway would not be of' public utility. A motion for a new trial made by the appellant was overruled, and judgment was rendered upon the verdict.

The ruling upon the motion for a new trial is assigned as error. This motion embraces several causes, none of which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Bissell v. WertIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Bennett v. MeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hagaman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Yost v. ConroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Lipscomb v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API