Legal Opinion

Pedrina v. Han Kuk Chun

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided June 27, 1995No. 89-00439 ACKPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR ALL DEFENDANTS

KAY, Chief Judge.

BACKGROUND

This action arises out of Defendant Y.Y. Valley Corporation’s (“YYVC”) attempt to relocate and evict Plaintiffs, 1 who were tenants at will on land purchased by YYVC. In 1986, Royal Hawaiian Country Club, Inc. (“RHCC”), a subsidiary of YYVC, applied for and was granted a Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) from the Director of the Department of Land Utilization (“DLU”) of the City and County of Honolulu, allowing the corporation to develop a…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. HT & T CO.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
  2. Pedrina v. ChunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Clark v. Columbia/HCA Information Services, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Crestwood Golf Club, Inc. v. PotterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. TaseskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API