Legal Opinion
Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 4, 2015No. 2015-1020PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge PROST. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
*1356PROST, Chief Judge.
This appeal arises from the inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 7,712,-683 (“'683 patent”) owned by Prolitec, Inc. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) concluded that both of the claims in the '683 patent were unpatentable as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 alone and additionally as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. See ScentAir Techs., Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., IPR2013-00179, Paper No. 60, 2014 WL 2965704 (PTAB June…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Key Pharmaceuticals v. Hercon Laboratories CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re Man MacHine Interface Technologies LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re: Aqua Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re: Aqua Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.