Legal Opinion
Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 3, 2008No. C04-02123 MJJ, C04-03327 MJJ, C04-03732 MJJ, C05-03117 MJJPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ NONIN-FRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are five summary judgment motions brought by the Defendants (Bayer, Roche, and BD/Nova) in these related patent infringement actions. The motions include three non-infringement motions:(1) a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement brought by Bayer with respect to the '551 patent;(2) a motion for partial summary judgment of noninfringement brought by Roche with respect to the '745 patent; and(3) a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Solvay, S.A. v. Honeywell Specialty Materials LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.