Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Alamogordo

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1996No. 22550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

1.This case addresses an issue of first impression in New Mexico: whether, in a home-rule municipality, an ordinance changing the rates that a city-owned utility charges is subject to popular review by referendum. We decide that such an ordinance is not subject to a referendum.

I. FACTS

2. In 1977 the City of Alamogordo, New Mexico, passed revenue bond Ordinance 555 to finance city water and sewer improvements. As required by Ordinance 555, Alamogordo conducted yearly audits of water and sewer revenues and expenses. These audits identified deficits for the years 1990…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Mervynne v. AckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. In Re Supreme Court Adjudication of Initiative Petitions in NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TowerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Swetzof v. PhilemonoffAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Stop Exploiting Taxpayers v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. City of Boise City v. Keep the Commandments CoalitionIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Boise City v. Keep the Commandments CoalitionIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API