Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Abbott Worsted Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 23, 1942No. 3752PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order dated October 30, 1941, directed against Abbott Worsted Mills, Inc. of Wilton, New Hampshire. 49 Stat. 454, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e). Respondent’s sole point in opposition is that the record contains no substantial evidence warranting the Board’s finding that Wilfred Champagne was laid off or discharged because, of his efforts at the plant to revive a local of Textile Workers Union of America (C.I.O.). It is conceded that respondent is subject to the Act. No exception is taken to the remedial terms of the order.

Champagne…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. J. G. Boswell Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Transport Clearings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Joseph Antell, Inc., National Labor Relations Board v. Malone Knitting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. Elastic Stop Nut Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API