Legal Opinion
Tootle v. Arinc, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 10, 2004No. CIV.A. CCB-03-1086PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
Now pending before the court is a motion for class certification, submitted by the plaintiff, Dan C. Tootle. The defendants oppose this motion. The issues in this motion have been briefed and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, the motion for class certification will be denied, and count V of the plaintiffs third amended complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
BACKGROUND
Dan Tootle was employed by the defendant, ARINC, Inc. (“ARINC”), from September 16, 1996 through March…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Joseph D. Griggs v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Joseph D. Griggs v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & AgentsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Richards v. Fleetboston Financial Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Laurent v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Citigroup Pension Plan ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.