Sullivan v. Sullivan
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiff, Muriel Sullivan, appeals from the judgment of the trial court fixing the amount of alimony arrearage due from the defendant, William W. Sullivan, to the plaintiff. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly interpreted the provisions *502of the parties’ separation agreement dealing with adjustments in alimony for inflation and, on the basis of that incorrect interpretation, miscalculated the amount of alimony arrearage. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our consideration of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dubis v. East Greenwich Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Grant v. NelliusSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Way v. WayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bijur v. BijurConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Kremenitzer v. KremenitzerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cushman v. CushmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006