Legal Opinion

Cushman v. Cushman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 17, 2006No. AC 25541PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BERDON, J.

The plaintiff, Robert E. Cushman, appeals from the postjudgment alimony orders of the trial court that stem from the parties’ 1999 judgment of dissolution. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) inquired whether there was a substantial change of circumstances instead of conducting a de novo review of the parties’ financial circumstances pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-82, as required by the separation agreement that was incorporated into the judgment of dissolution, (2) awarded excessive alimony to the defendant, Lee Cushman, and (3) failed to find that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Demaria v. DemariaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Dombrowski v. Noyes-DombrowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Kremenitzer v. KremenitzerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Olson v. OlsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Sullivan v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zahringer v. ZahringerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Taylor v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Corrarino v. CorrarinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Szegda v. SzegdaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Murphy v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API