Edwin L. Moore v. Captain Schoeman Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Edwin L. Moore appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 writ of habeas corpus. We previously granted petitioner a certificate of appealability (COA), see id. § 2253(c). We now reverse and remand. 1
A habeas petitioner is required to exhaust his state court remedies prior to obtaining federal habeas review. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). Faced with a petition containing only unexhausted claims, the district court ordinarily has two options. First, it may dismiss the petition and allow the petitioner to return to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Cargle v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Fontenot v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Frost v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Ross v. County of BernalilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.