Legal Opinion

Weir v. Corbett

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1964No. Civ. 27102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.

This action was brought to recover money due under a Washington judgment. Summary judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendants' appeal raises a single issue of whether the Washington statute which places a six-year limitation upon the effect of a judgment should operate to extinguish the California judgment when six years have elapsed from the date the Washington judgment was entered.

The facts pertinent to this issue may be stated briefly. On October 19, 1956, a judgment was entered in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County in favor of plaintiff and against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Board of Public Works v. Columbia CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Roche v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huntington National Bank v. SproulNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kahn v. BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Thompson v. WAYNE SMITH CONST. CO., INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Parhm v. ParhmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Gaughan v. First Community BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API