Legal Opinion

People v. Rosado

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided July 18, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ellen M. Coin, J.

Defendant is charged with criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree (in violation of Penal Law § 170.20) and forgery in the third degree (in violation of Penal Law § 170.05). By omnibus motion he moves, inter alia, for an order dismissing the charges as facially insufficient.

An information is facially sufficient if it contains facts of an evidentiary character tending to support the charges. (CPL 100.15 [3]; People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729 [1986].) Furthermore, the information must contain nonhearsay allegations which establish, if true,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ManiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SpannCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  2. People v. LebronCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  3. People v. RoaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  4. People v. ThorneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015
  5. People v. OrtaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API