Legal Opinion

People v. Orta

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 15, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Armando Montano, J.

Defendant is charged by superseding information with criminal trespass in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.10 [a]), use of parks; hours of operation (Rules of City of NY Dept of Parks and Recreation [56 RCNY] § 1-03 [a] [3]); and trespass (Penal Law § 140.05).

Defendant moves for an order (1) dismissing counts one and three, Penal Law § 140.10 (a) and Penal Law § 140.05, respectively, as facially insufficient; (2) suppressing any and all statements taken from defendant for which proper notice was given, or in the alternative, granting a Huntley ¡Dunaway…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. SyllaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
  5. People v. HightowerNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API