Legal Opinion

People v. Spann

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 19, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony J. Ferrara, J.

These defendants are each charged with criminal trespass in *655the second degree (Penal Law § 140.15). In sum, the complaint alleges that the defendants were observed within an apartment building leaving apartment 1C through the front door, and they did not have permission or authority to be inside the apartment. The sole facts alleged to support this conclusion are: (a) the defendants’ home addresses differ from the building address, and (b) although defendants asserted they were visiting the tenant in apartment 1C, they could not give the tenant’s full…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. ScottCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. People v. JamesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
  3. People v. MessinaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2011
  4. People v. SitonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API