Legal Opinion

Sneed v. Belt

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 8, 1981No. 1 CA-CIV 4952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

The question presented on appeal is whether, by accepting medical benefits paid pursuant to the workmen’s compensation act, an injured employee has waived her right to bring a tort action against her employer who had allegedly failed to post a statutorily required notice of the employee’s right to reject the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act. 1

The employee has appealed from the entry of summary judgment in favor of her employer. Therefore we state the facts in a light most favorable to her. 2 She was employed as a cocktail waitress by appellee, Nite…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sorenson v. Six Companies, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Sims v. MoeurArizona Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Regnier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Allen v. Southwest Salt Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Associated Hosts of Georgia, Inc. v. MarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Tisdel v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API