Tisdel v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
In this special action review, we determine that a claimant is entitled to interest on permanent benefits from the time they are allowed until the time they are paid.
On April 22, 1970, the claimant suffered a compensable injury to his right knee while working for respondent employer, United Parcel Service. Claimant’s average monthly wage was established at $830.35. On November 29, 1971, claimant’s doctor authored a medical report stating that claimant’s condition had become stationary, and that claimant could be discharged with a 10% disability of his right lower extremity-
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parker v. Brinson Construction CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Goodnite v. Farm Equipment CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
- Land & Marine Rental Co. v. RawlsAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Nation v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weaver v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Tisdel v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.