Legal Opinion

Tisdel v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 19, 1988No. 1 CA-IC 3515PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

In this special action review, we determine that a claimant is entitled to interest on permanent benefits from the time they are allowed until the time they are paid.

On April 22, 1970, the claimant suffered a compensable injury to his right knee while working for respondent employer, United Parcel Service. Claimant’s average monthly wage was established at $830.35. On November 29, 1971, claimant’s doctor authored a medical report stating that claimant’s condition had become stationary, and that claimant could be discharged with a 10% disability of his right lower extremity-

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. Brinson Construction CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Goodnite v. Farm Equipment CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Land & Marine Rental Co. v. RawlsAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Nation v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weaver v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Tisdel v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API