Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. City of Cumming

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1954No. 18681PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. While the charter of the City of Cumming (Ga. L. 1935, pp. 1001, 1037) does not expressly authorize the city to supply water from its city water system to customers outside its corporate limits (Mayor &c. of Gainesville v. Dunlap, 147 Ga. 344, 94 S. E. 247; City of Cornelia v. Wells, 181 Ga. 554, 183 S. E. 66), since the enactment of that charter by the General Assembly and the rendition of the above decisions, the General Assembly enacted the Revenue Certificate Law of 1937, as amended by the act approved March 14, 1939 (Code, Ann. Supp., Chapter 87-8), which provides,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dejarnette v. Hospital Authority of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Gainesville v. DunlapSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Owens v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Cade v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Hagans v. Excelsior Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Rogers v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Barnett v. BolingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. London v. Atlanta Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. London v. Atlanta Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API