Johnson v. State of Georgia
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
The City of Chickamauga contends that it had the discretionary power to contract to purchase power from the Georgia Power Company or the TVA and that in keeping with its own best interest it chose the latter. We agree that in general such an exercise of legislative discretion is reviewable only at the ballot box. If under our Constitution and laws, a municipal corporation lawfully undertakes to establish and operate an electric distribution system and opens its arms to invite the TVA to supply the power, it is not for this or any other court to forbid the embrace. Nevertheless, we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Horkan v. City of MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- City of MacOn v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Screws v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Memphis Power & Light Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Middlesboro v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Powder Springs v. WMM Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Copper Country Mobile Home Park v. City of GlobeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Terrace Heights Sewer District v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Brown v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.