Legal Opinion

London v. Atlanta Transit Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1955No. 35490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

We will first consider the question as to whether the petition set forth a cause of action against the defendant C. L. Fain Company.

*756The allegations show that, because of the proximity of Demsey’s jeep to the bus when the bus was brought to a sudden stop, Demsey was unable to bring the jeep to a stop without colliding with the rear end of the bus. For the same reason it appears that it was not within the power of the Fain driver to stop before reaching the point where the bus stopped. The petition alleges that the Fain vehicle and the Demsey car were “practically alongside” each other in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Platt v. Southern Photo Material Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Cochran v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Houston v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Lipscomb v. City of CummingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Dixie Drive It Yourself System, Atlanta Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. McDaniel v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. London v. Atlanta Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API