Barnett v. Boling
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
1. The act (Ga. L. 1958, p. 2362), abolishing the fee system and placing the Sheriff of Forsyth County on a salary, is not violative of art. 3, sec. 11, par. 1- of the Constitution as amended in 1956 (Code, Ann., § 2-2301), since that provision of the Constitution refers only to salaries set forth in the Constitution, and does not refer to county officers, who, under art. 11, sec. 2, par. 2 of the Constitution (Code, Ann., § 2-7902), “may be on a fee basis, salary basis, or fee basis supplemented by salary, in such manner as may be directed by law,” which may be changed by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Franklin v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Drost v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Laurens County v. KeenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Houlihan v. SaussySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warren v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Freeman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Smith v. BranchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Gainer v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Freeman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006