Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1973No. Civ. 32829PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

Petitioner in fact, Maurice S. Marcus, an attorney, seeks review and annulment of an en banc order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board adjudging him in contempt of the board and ordering him to pay a fine of $100 within 30 days or be committed to the county jail to be imprisoned for a period of 5 days.

The alleged contempt occurred during the course of a hearing before a referee in which petitioner represented an applicant for workmen’s compensation benefits, when, understandably provoked by an implication that he had fabricated evidence, petitioner stepped down…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. TijerinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Arthur v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Perry Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Crawford v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Rowen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API