Legal Opinion

Monongahela Power Co. v. Schriber

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 14, 2004No. C2-04-084PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

On February 2, 2004, Plaintiff, Monongahela Power Company (“Mon Power”), filed a Complaint for Declaratory and In-junctive Relief and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Mon Power brings this action against Defendants, Alan R. Schri-ber, Ronda Hartman Fergus, Judith A. Jones, Donald L. Mason and Clarence D. Rogers, Jr. (collectively “Defendants” or “Commissioners”), in their official capacities as Commissioners of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO”). For the reasons that follow, Mon Power’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED IN…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Family Prepaid Legal Corp. v. Columbus Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Ohio State University v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Damon's Restaurants, Inc. v. Eileen K Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. Blankenship v. BlackwellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. Wilkins v. DanielsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API