Legal Opinion
People v. On Sight Mobile Opticians
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 8, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the judgments of conviction are reversed, on the law, the accusatory instruments are dismissed, and the fines, if paid, are remitted.
Defendant was charged, in each of five separate informations, respectively, with placing a sign advertising its opticians’ business on public property at five locations in the Town of Brook-haven in violation of Town of Brookhaven Code § 57A-11 (B), which prohibits commercial advertising on public property and roads. Defendant’s counsel entered not guilty pleas on defendant’s behalf and moved to dismiss the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The People v. On Sight Mobile OpticiansNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. RichmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2014
- People v. CMWV, LLCAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020