Legal Opinion
The People v. On Sight Mobile Opticians
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2014No. 222PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the judgments of District Court reinstated.
On May 3, 2011, a town investigator with the Town of Brook-haven (Town) filed five informations (subsequently superseded) against On Sight Mobile Opticians (On Sight). Each information charged On Sight with violating section 57A-11 of the Town Code of the Town of Brookhaven (Town Code) by placing a sign advertising its opticians’ business on public property, and included the precise address and location of the offending sign. Section 57A-11, entitled “Signs, posters…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York State Superfund Coalition, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. On Sight Mobile OpticiansAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- White v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of New York State Land Tit. Assn., Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Fin. Servs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- New York Bankers Ass'n v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- People v. CMWV, LLCAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.