Legal Opinion
Greenfeld v. Maryland Jockey Club
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 20, 1948No. [No. 100, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing, on demurrer, a bill for (a) a declaratory decree that plaintiff is entitled, upon payment of admission charges, to attend any race meetings conducted by defendant and (6) an injunction against denial of this alleged right or interference with him “while in attendance as a spectator and bettor” at any race meeting.
The bill purports to state in substance various provisions of the Racing Commission law, (Code, Art. 78B, as amended), sets out Rule 226 of the Maryland Racing Commission: “The Chief Inspector shall keep a record of the names and addresses…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Western Turf Assn. v. GreenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Marrone v. Washington Jockey ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mahoney v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Flores v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. LicataNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Drews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Garifine v. Monmouth Park Jockey ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.